SELF-ASSESSMENT TASK

EVALUATION OF MY PERFORMANCE

INVESTIGATE STAGE

CRITERION A: Investigate

In this criterion, I’d give myself 4/6, this because reading the assessment criteria based on the investigation, I noticed that I didn’t do enough work to get a 5 or a 6, but I worked well on my design specification, therefore on limits, demands and wishes about my poster. I think that to get a 5 or a 6 I should improve my Design Brief because it is a bit to brief. I think that the best thing that I did is the research, due to the fact that I compared ten different sources to answer to ten different guiding questions. I summarised the information that I found on each website and, at the end of the guiding questions, I did a bibliography and finally I illustrated all the website where I looked so that my audience could see how have I found them and why are they useful for my project.

DESIGN STAGE

CRITERION B: Design

I believe that in this criteria I’ll get a 4+/6, because I’m really closed to reach level 5 but I’m missing a few details. In my design stage I put on my blog the four images of my poster, I wrote a short explanation of them and I evaluated each one using my design specification table. I wrote why I selected my final poster and why I didn’t select the other ones. I think that I could improve my design stage better specifying my decision about my final poster and how I create it.


CREATE STAGE

CRITERION D: Create

In this criterion I expect a 4/6. This because I followed my plan and any time that I made any changes, I wrote a short process journal and I added  a screenshot of all the work done. The quality of my creation is quite high even if it could be better; I could improve my techniques and equipment used. I’m quite satisfied of my final product and I think that the impact won’t be bad.  

 

EVALUATION  STAGE

CRITERION E: Evaluate

As in nearly all the criterions, I hope that in the evaluation stage I’ll get  a 4/6. I give myself this mark because in my opinion I did this stage quite well. I evaluated all my stages and I wrote what could I improve and which one is the best part of the stage. The only criteria that I didn’t evaluate is criterion F, this because Mr. Mariani told us not to evaluate it because it is about our attitude in computer technology, our behaviour in class and our participation during the lessons. I evaluated the success of my product doing a survey in class and asking questions about my poster to my classmates. Thanks to their judgements, I could improve my poster and change the things that they didn’t like (e.g. background).